ryf.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,006,676
▼ 47,794
- Rank in TLD
- #44,461
▼ 1,067
- Referring Domains
- 44
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.2
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.9
- Referring Domains
- 44
- Linked Domains
- 25
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 13
20–29 9
30–39 8
40–49 5
50–59 1
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 44
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| microsoft.com | 91.9 | #33 |
| presseportal.de | 67.7 | #4,992 |
| gelbeseiten.de | 60.6 | #15,768 |
| kennstdueinen.de | 55.7 | #37,156 |
| hameln.de | 48.9 | #115,267 |
| oeffnungszeitenbuch.de | 43.5 | #282,141 |
| hamburg-magazin.de | 41.6 | #377,835 |
| famila-nordost.de | 41.0 | #417,582 |
| stadt-gengenbach.de | 40.9 | #423,892 |
| tophair.de | 36.7 | #759,013 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2021
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
gast.ryf.dewww.shop.ryf.dewww.ryf.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ryf.de | 86400 | 20.105.216.31 |
| MX | ryf.de | 86400 | 5 ryf-de.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | ryf.de | 3600 | ns53.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | ryf.de | 3600 | ns54.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | ryf.de | 3600 | ns53.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026051900 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | ryf.de | 86400 | sendinblue-code:51238a4971dfd350cb5e746070101cd0 |
| TXT | ryf.de | 86400 | MS=ms46627261 |
| TXT | ryf.de | 86400 | v=spf1 ip4:213.160.22.250 ip4:213.160.22.254 ip4:87.193.180.197 include:spf.protection.outlook.com mx -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.