Skip to content

pvt.ru

This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.

Domain Power Rank
15.0
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#19,885,336

▲ 4,405,359

Rank in TLD
#433,926

▲ 122,410

Referring Domains
6

▲ 2

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
26.9
Subdomains
3,073
Domain age
15 yr 10 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
moskvichmag.ru51.9#69,857
eawards.ru31.8#1,669,252
euroluki.ru27.1#3,503,340
vserinki.ru22.8#6,419,210
selectcr.ru18.0#13,328,085
navimoda.com9.9#40,286,492

Basic Information

Registration date
31 Dec 2010
Expires
31 Dec 2026 (56 days remaining)
Registrar
RU-CENTER-RU

Subdomain

1-iyy-vyazovskiy-4.pvt.ru1-tverskaya-yahmskaya-27.pvt.ru1-tverskaya-yahmskaya-32.pvt.ru1-y-avtozavodskiy-4.pvt.ru1-y-basmannihy-pereulok-5-20s1.pvt.ru1-y-golutvinskiy-6.pvt.ru1-y-hvostov-pereulok-5.pvt.ru1-y-irtiyshskiy.pvt.ru1-y-khvostov-3as2.pvt.ru1-y-kolobovskiy-17s1.pvt.ru1-y-kolobovskiy-pereulok-273s3.pvt.ru1-y-kozhevnicheskiy-8.pvt.ru1-y-krasnogvardeyskiy-pr-d-12s3.pvt.ru1-y-krasnoseljskiy-per-9a.pvt.ru1-y-luhberetckiy-proezd-d-2s1.pvt.ru1-y-nagatinskiy-proezd-2.pvt.ru1-y-pereulok-truzhenikov-12s2.pvt.ru1-y-shipkovskiy-per-5.pvt.ru1-y-smolenskiy-24.pvt.ru1-y-spasonalivkovskiy-20.pvt.ru

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Apvt.ru60084.201.165.205
MXpvt.ru60010 mx.yandex.net
NSpvt.ru3600ns1.yandexcloud.net
NSpvt.ru3600ns2.yandexcloud.net
SOApvt.ru3600ns1.yandexcloud.net. mx.cloud.yandex.net. 1 10800 900 604800 900
TXTpvt.ru600v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net; mailru-verification: 1c2baf78a3b54d35; google-site-verification=EyyCZQv3UgJm0abPK8JG5bRssVk6gchFcyfPv5q3Ne4

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Configuration error

The SPF record contains invalid syntax.

DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.