selectcr.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #13,328,085
▲ 699,801
- Rank in TLD
- #285,167
▲ 27,391
- Referring Domains
- 9
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.0
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 7 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.4
- Referring Domains
- 9
- Linked Domains
- 241
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 1
20–29 5
30–39 2
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 9
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| cfo.gov.ru | 41.0 | #412,005 |
| association-cfo.ru | 34.4 | #1,106,433 |
| sezlipetsk.ru | 33.0 | #1,414,499 |
| investryazan.ru | 28.2 | #2,952,503 |
| invest-tula.com | 26.4 | #3,872,217 |
| tverinvest.ru | 25.1 | #4,669,338 |
| gordeevka-udarnik.ru | 21.0 | #8,285,182 |
| invest32.ru | 20.9 | #8,429,086 |
| sezlipetsk.com | 12.7 | #27,183,691 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 20 Aug 2019
- Expires
- 20 Aug 2027 (288 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED UNVERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- TIMEWEB-RU
Subdomain
lk.selectcr.ruwww.selectcr.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | selectcr.ru | 600 | 46.229.213.212 |
| MX | selectcr.ru | 600 | 20 mx2.timeweb.ru |
| MX | selectcr.ru | 600 | 10 mx1.timeweb.ru |
| NS | selectcr.ru | 600 | ns3.timeweb.org |
| NS | selectcr.ru | 600 | ns2.timeweb.ru |
| NS | selectcr.ru | 600 | ns4.timeweb.org |
| NS | selectcr.ru | 600 | ns1.timeweb.ru |
| SOA | selectcr.ru | 600 | ns1.timeweb.ru. dns.timeweb.ru. 21 28800 7200 259200 300 |
| TXT | selectcr.ru | 600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.timeweb.ru ~all |
| TXT | selectcr.ru | 600 | yandex-verification: 3f80f19a73a44099 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.