zoonlab.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #9,120,646
▼ 2,700,130
- Rank in TLD
- #512,230
▼ 165,635
- Referring Domains
- 15
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.9
- Referring Domains
- 15
- Linked Domains
- 39
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 4
20–29 8
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 15
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| norecopa.no | 47.7 | #143,149 |
| secal.es | 31.8 | #1,680,387 |
| noraybio.com | 29.9 | #2,265,570 |
| space2agriculture.de | 29.7 | #2,351,325 |
| reprefred.eu | 29.5 | #2,410,375 |
| analysis.rs | 26.3 | #3,948,192 |
| colloque-afstal.com | 26.1 | #4,087,485 |
| infralab.com | 24.9 | #4,810,306 |
| bia.si | 21.8 | #7,380,091 |
| analysisdoo.com | 20.4 | #9,127,342 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2018
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.zoonlab.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | zoonlab.de | 3600 | 217.160.0.171 |
| AAAA | zoonlab.de | 3600 | 2001:8d8:100f:f000::216 |
| MX | zoonlab.de | 3600 | 20 mx02.hornetsecurity.com |
| MX | zoonlab.de | 3600 | 40 mx04.hornetsecurity.com |
| MX | zoonlab.de | 3600 | 30 mx03.hornetsecurity.com |
| MX | zoonlab.de | 3600 | 10 mx01.hornetsecurity.com |
| NS | zoonlab.de | 172800 | ns1095.ui-dns.de |
| NS | zoonlab.de | 172800 | ns1095.ui-dns.biz |
| NS | zoonlab.de | 172800 | ns1095.ui-dns.org |
| NS | zoonlab.de | 172800 | ns1095.ui-dns.com |
| SOA | zoonlab.de | 86400 | ns1095.ui-dns.biz. hostmaster.kundenserver.de. 2017051047 28800 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | zoonlab.de | 3600 | MS=ms43257996 |
| TXT | zoonlab.de | 60 | v=spf1 redirect=zoonlab.de.spf.hornetdmarc.com |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.