Skip to content

zenit.de

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
44.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#255,772

▼ 28,024

Rank in TLD
#10,994

▼ 825

Referring Domains
353

▼ 13

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
33.0
Subdomains
18
Domain age
–

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
europa.eu90.5#44
nrw.de76.9#885
fraunhofer.de74.2#1,503
ihk.de73.9#1,591
gencat.cat71.3#2,639
rwth-aachen.de69.4#3,770
dlr.de66.4#6,088
uni-due.de65.5#6,903
uni-bielefeld.de64.7#7,832
aragon.es63.0#10,238

Basic Information

Last updated
18 Jan 2021
Domain statuses
active
Registry
DENIC eG

Subdomain

cea.zenit.dedigihealthstart.zenit.dedownload.zenit.deempowa.zenit.dehorizon2020.zenit.denetworking2016-nrw-pl.horizon2020.zenit.dewww.horizon2020.zenit.dehorizont.zenit.demedizin.horizont.zenit.dehorizont2020.zenit.dewww.horizont2020.zenit.deinnoaudit.zenit.demobil.zenit.denetzwerk.zenit.dewww.netzwerk.zenit.desurvey.zenit.dewebservice.zenit.dewww.zenit.de

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Azenit.de600185.166.20.225
MXzenit.de6001 zenit-de.mail.protection.outlook.com
NSzenit.de3600ns13.domaincontrol.com
NSzenit.de3600ns14.domaincontrol.com
SOAzenit.de3600ns13.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026101701 28800 7200 604800 600
TXTzenit.de600vfvlr041lu5qhv7fnjnt51k7ub
TXTzenit.de600 google-site-verification=ziCnHGfkAPO3DmgXNF0CWvxeEco-0S23sHbnjUGHMmA
TXTzenit.de600v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.crsend.com include:agenturserver.de ip4:167.235.16.180/32 ip4:212.227.0.0/16 ip4:80.237.130.32/32 -all
TXTzenit.de600ef2d140723cd52d6443dd784972f0f76

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.