writersweekly.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #282,789
▲ 2,498
- Rank in TLD
- #118,192
▲ 217
- Referring Domains
- 575
▼ 8
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.9
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- 27 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.2
- Referring Domains
- 575
- Linked Domains
- 3,298
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 86
10–19 182
20–29 141
30–39 71
40–49 46
50–59 23
60–69 15
70–79 5
80–89 4
90–100 2
Total 575
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| tinyurl.com | 84.1 | #186 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| entrepreneur.com | 78.3 | #670 |
| vt.edu | 71.7 | #2,498 |
| thedailybeast.com | 70.9 | #2,887 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 17 Sept 1999
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 19 Jan 2027 (75 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Domain.com - Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
forums.writersweekly.commarketplace.writersweekly.comwww.marketplace.writersweekly.comsearch.writersweekly.comwww.writersweekly.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | writersweekly.com | 3600 | 216.252.192.159 |
| MX | writersweekly.com | 3600 | 10 filtmx2.bnt.com |
| MX | writersweekly.com | 3600 | 10 filtmx1.bnt.com |
| NS | writersweekly.com | 3600 | ns1.bnt.com |
| NS | writersweekly.com | 3600 | ns2.bnt.com |
| SOA | writersweekly.com | 3600 | localhost.bnt.com. hostmaster.bnt.com. 2026020301 10800 3600 1814400 1800 |
| TXT | writersweekly.com | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:216.252.192.0/24 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.