wqcs.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #745,486
▲ 52,197
- Rank in TLD
- #81,342
▲ 4,324
- Referring Domains
- 228
▼ 9
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.7
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 27 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 30.2
- Referring Domains
- 228
- Linked Domains
- 2,494
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 22
10–19 52
20–29 39
30–39 36
40–49 28
50–59 31
60–69 11
70–79 5
80–89 3
90–100 1
Total 228
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| iheart.com | 81.0 | #389 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| ufl.edu | 74.1 | #1,532 |
| tamu.edu | 73.6 | #1,710 |
| thedailybeast.com | 70.9 | #2,887 |
| udn.com | 70.8 | #2,942 |
| smallbiztrends.com | 70.8 | #2,941 |
| fsu.edu | 69.4 | #3,773 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 24 May 1999
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 24 May 2028 (566 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
news.wqcs.orgwww.wqcs.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | wqcs.org | 300 | 35.168.120.9 |
| MX | wqcs.org | 3600 | 0 wqcs-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | wqcs.org | 3600 | ns1-01.azure-dns.com |
| NS | wqcs.org | 3600 | ns2-01.azure-dns.net |
| NS | wqcs.org | 3600 | ns3-01.azure-dns.org |
| NS | wqcs.org | 3600 | ns4-01.azure-dns.info |
| SOA | wqcs.org | 300 | ns1-01.azure-dns.com. hostmaster. 2020101406 10800 3600 86400 86400 |
| TXT | wqcs.org | 3600 | MS=ms71895476 |
| TXT | wqcs.org | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:64.56.91.23 include:ircc.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.