wochenanzeiger.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #105,333
▼ 10,728
- Rank in TLD
- #4,289
▼ 400
- Referring Domains
- 685
▼ 5
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.8
- Subdomains
- 8
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.0
- Referring Domains
- 685
- Linked Domains
- 1,039
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 103
10–19 207
20–29 175
30–39 114
40–49 60
50–59 12
60–69 9
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 685
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| google.de | 86.9 | #97 |
| bayern.de | 77.4 | #793 |
| change.org | 77.0 | #847 |
| tum.de | 71.0 | #2,818 |
| follow.it | 69.6 | #3,635 |
| tu-dresden.de | 68.3 | #4,563 |
| muenchen.de | 67.4 | #5,215 |
| hypotheses.org | 67.0 | #5,550 |
| openpetition.de | 64.5 | #8,115 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2007
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
har.wochenanzeiger.demnr.wochenanzeiger.dewww.mnr.wochenanzeiger.demz.wochenanzeiger.desok.wochenanzeiger.dessl.wochenanzeiger.detsv1860.wochenanzeiger.dewww.wochenanzeiger.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | 212.18.23.204 |
| MX | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | 10 proxmox.haiberg.net |
| NS | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | ns.ipn.de |
| NS | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | ns.link-m.de |
| SOA | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | ns.link-m.de. hostmaster.link-m.de. 2026030401 28800 3600 864000 86400 |
| TXT | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | v=spf1 mx ip4:82.135.8.73 include:spf.turbo-smtp.com include:turbo-smtp.com ~all |
| TXT | wochenanzeiger.de | 300 | MS=ms53311438 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.