windowsradar.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #5,911,713
▼ 1,155,691
- Rank in TLD
- #2,482,384
▼ 487,303
- Referring Domains
- 43
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 7 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.6
- Referring Domains
- 43
- Linked Domains
- 1,109
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 7
10–19 6
20–29 11
30–39 11
40–49 2
50–59 5
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 43
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| saashub.com | 58.4 | #23,357 |
| iobit.com | 55.4 | #39,199 |
| icwsm.org | 54.7 | #43,695 |
| videoproc.com | 53.7 | #52,409 |
| itopvpn.com | 50.6 | #87,474 |
| diskpart.com | 48.7 | #119,951 |
| bly.com | 45.9 | #191,429 |
| funk.eu | 34.1 | #1,151,492 |
| trionds.com | 34.1 | #1,161,830 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 11 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 16 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 11 Oct 2027 (341 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- HOSTINGER operations, UAB
Subdomain
www.windowsradar.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | windowsradar.com | 60 | 84.32.84.67 |
| A | windowsradar.com | 60 | 2.57.91.129 |
| AAAA | windowsradar.com | 60 | 2a02:4780:84:5510:c82e:5860:c582:143f |
| AAAA | windowsradar.com | 60 | 2a02:4780:84:60aa:7a9f:d253:c199:f84 |
| MX | windowsradar.com | 14400 | 5 mx1.hostinger.com |
| MX | windowsradar.com | 14400 | 10 mx2.hostinger.com |
| NS | windowsradar.com | 86400 | orbit.dns-parking.com |
| NS | windowsradar.com | 86400 | horizon.dns-parking.com |
| SOA | windowsradar.com | 3600 | orbit.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026102901 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| TXT | windowsradar.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.