wikidandan.com
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #5,724,325
▼ 244,814
- Rank in TLD
- #2,400,527
▼ 101,079
- Referring Domains
- 28
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 2 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.5
- Referring Domains
- 28
- Linked Domains
- 46
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 8
10–19 7
20–29 10
30–39 2
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 28
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| tibablog.ir | 50.3 | #91,050 |
| majalesalamat.com | 39.2 | #538,289 |
| akhbarrasmi.com | 36.2 | #811,282 |
| drdarvishpour.com | 28.7 | #2,764,636 |
| noskhe.com | 26.4 | #3,913,324 |
| tajdental.clinic | 26.3 | #3,953,379 |
| dandan.world | 25.2 | #4,639,020 |
| drkamyarkhezri.com | 24.2 | #5,346,502 |
| donya.clinic | 23.7 | #5,721,116 |
| labkhandfa.com | 23.1 | #6,138,672 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 2 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 4 May 2026
- Expires
- 2 Dec 2026 (27 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc
Subdomain
www.wikidandan.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | wikidandan.com | 3600 | 95.38.60.152 |
| MX | wikidandan.com | 600 | 10 mail.wikidandan.com |
| NS | wikidandan.com | 86400 | wind.parspack.net |
| NS | wikidandan.com | 86400 | foothills.parspack.net |
| SOA | wikidandan.com | 600 | wind.parspack.net. postmaster.wikidandan.com. 2026062702 10800 7200 604800 86400 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
A mail server hostname could not be resolved to an IP address.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.