wecanmag.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #2,399,403
▼ 1,940,470
- Rank in TLD
- #1,011,362
▼ 823,775
- Referring Domains
- 74
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 8 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Referring Domains
- 74
- Linked Domains
- 4,629
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 18
20–29 21
30–39 13
40–49 9
50–59 4
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 74
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| getresponse.com | 73.8 | #1,621 |
| feedspot.com | 69.9 | #3,431 |
| pchome.com.tw | 63.7 | #9,142 |
| commentsold.com | 57.7 | #26,316 |
| recruitingdaily.com | 51.1 | #80,369 |
| ssonetwork.com | 50.5 | #89,172 |
| lilachbullock.com | 50.1 | #94,338 |
| hurix.com | 49.2 | #110,502 |
| getresponse.pl | 48.7 | #120,413 |
| b2bnn.com | 48.5 | #123,574 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 9 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2021
- Expires
- 9 Aug 2027 (277 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- IONOS SE
Subdomain
www.wecanmag.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | wecanmag.com | 84887 | 64.20.62.151 |
| MX | wecanmag.com | 86400 | 25 mail.wecanmag.com |
| NS | wecanmag.com | 86400 | cdns1.interserver.net |
| NS | wecanmag.com | 86400 | cdns2.interserver.net |
| NS | wecanmag.com | 86400 | cdns3.interserver.net |
| SOA | wecanmag.com | 86400 | cdns1.interserver.net. dns.interserver.net. 2026070803 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | wecanmag.com | 86400 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:206.72.197.142 +include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.