web2.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,414,238
▼ 262,586
- Rank in TLD
- #32,873
▼ 4,443
- Referring Domains
- 149
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.6
- Subdomains
- 58
- Domain age
- 22 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.2
- Referring Domains
- 149
- Linked Domains
- 4,642
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 49
20–29 25
30–39 23
40–49 14
50–59 9
60–69 7
70–79 5
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 149
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| fc2.com | 77.6 | #755 |
| exblog.jp | 73.8 | #1,603 |
| biglobe.ne.jp | 73.4 | #1,787 |
| livedoor.jp | 72.6 | #2,091 |
| blog.jp | 71.0 | #2,805 |
| seesaa.net | 69.2 | #3,907 |
| coocan.jp | 66.6 | #5,914 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 18 Feb 2004
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2026
- Expires
- 28 Feb 2027 (115 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
Subdomain
aichi-walking.web2.jpalba.web2.jpalisato.web2.jpamgm.web2.jpbatikons.web2.jpbluemoon.web2.jpbousi-no-hako.web2.jpcode.web2.jpdatespot.web2.jpdiecast.web2.jpdob.web2.jpdosei.web2.jpenchanted.web2.jpenjyu.web2.jpexample.web2.jpfelicia.web2.jpflyingiznadrop.web2.jpg-star.web2.jpginryu.web2.jpgrand-cross.web2.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | web2.jp | 38400 | 150.95.144.135 |
| MX | web2.jp | 38400 | 10 mail.web2.jp |
| NS | web2.jp | 38400 | ns1.just-size.com |
| NS | web2.jp | 38400 | ns2.just-size.com |
| SOA | web2.jp | 38400 | ns1.just-size.com. admin.just-size.net. 2026090500 10800 3600 604800 38400 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.