vkimball.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #35,185,318
▲ 6,703,431
- Rank in TLD
- #15,834,526
▲ 3,143,509
- Referring Domains
- 4
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.5
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 28 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.7
- Referring Domains
- 4
- Linked Domains
- 758
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 2
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 4
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| mikeschinkel.com | 46.0 | #188,855 |
| jackvinson.com | 30.6 | #2,015,767 |
| contrapositivediary.com | 26.7 | #3,747,071 |
| vladville.com | 26.5 | #3,808,396 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 5 Feb 1998
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 4 Feb 2027 (91 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
weblog.vkimball.comwww.weblog.vkimball.comwww.vkimball.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | vkimball.com | 60 | 67.205.6.231 |
| AAAA | vkimball.com | 60 | 2607:f298:5:114b::139:d7da |
| MX | vkimball.com | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| MX | vkimball.com | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| NS | vkimball.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| NS | vkimball.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| NS | vkimball.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | vkimball.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026102500 20400 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | vkimball.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.