visual-planning.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #221,564
▲ 7,878
- Rank in TLD
- #93,496
▲ 2,434
- Referring Domains
- 315
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.8
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 25 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.0
- Referring Domains
- 315
- Linked Domains
- 98
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 68
20–29 98
30–39 75
40–49 32
50–59 20
60–69 5
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 315
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| monday.com | 77.6 | #750 |
| clickup.com | 73.2 | #1,851 |
| getharvest.com | 65.1 | #7,341 |
| usemotion.com | 61.7 | #12,863 |
| projectmanager.com | 61.3 | #13,917 |
| yapla.com | 60.9 | #14,881 |
| villanova.edu | 60.6 | #15,567 |
| cin7.com | 59.4 | #19,241 |
| wifitalents.com | 59.0 | #20,943 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 2 May 2001
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2025
- Expires
- 2 May 2027 (178 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
mediavp.visual-planning.comtools.visual-planning.comv5.visual-planning.comwww.visual-planning.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | visual-planning.com | 900 | 34.155.250.75 |
| MX | visual-planning.com | 900 | 10 mx1.visual-planning.com |
| NS | visual-planning.com | 900 | paris.amen.fr |
| NS | visual-planning.com | 900 | ns2.amen.fr |
| SOA | visual-planning.com | 900 | paris.amen.fr. root.amen.fr. 2026110308 86400 7200 2592000 300 |
| TXT | visual-planning.com | 900 | v=spf1 +a +mx include:visual-planning.com.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.