virtues.com.br
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #21,931,821
▼ 20,746,932
- Rank in TLD
- #201,496
▼ 189,986
- Referring Domains
- 2
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.6
- Referring Domains
- 2
- Linked Domains
- 40
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 1
30–39 1
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 2
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| virtues.ag | 37.9 | #640,181 |
| appsinsight.co | 27.2 | #3,450,127 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .brBrazil
- Domain statuses
- published
- Registry
- Comite Gestor da Internet no Brasil
Subdomain
blog.virtues.com.brwww.virtues.com.br
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | virtues.com.br | 1800 | 187.17.111.35 |
| MX | virtues.com.br | 1800 | 10 mx3.larksuite.com |
| MX | virtues.com.br | 1800 | 5 mx2.larksuite.com |
| MX | virtues.com.br | 1800 | 1 mx1.larksuite.com |
| NS | virtues.com.br | 1800 | ns1.dominios.uol.com.br |
| NS | virtues.com.br | 1800 | ns3.dominios.uol.com.br |
| NS | virtues.com.br | 1800 | ns2.dominios.uol.com.br |
| SOA | virtues.com.br | 1800 | ns1.dominios.uol.com.br. admin.uolhost.com.br. 2025092503 43200 3600 604800 1800 |
| TXT | virtues.com.br | 649 | verification-code-site-App_lark=N3yDHsSU7S5V6uE6PD2Z |
| TXT | virtues.com.br | 649 | v=spf1 include:spf.turbo-smtp.com +include:spf.onlarksuite.com -all |
| TXT | virtues.com.br | 649 | v=spf1 a mx include:spf.turbo-smtp.com ?all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
Multiple SPF records were found. Only one SPF policy should be published.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.