vetion.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #356,822
▼ 13,604
- Rank in TLD
- #15,666
▲ 36
- Referring Domains
- 189
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.3
- Subdomains
- 6
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.1
- Referring Domains
- 189
- Linked Domains
- 891
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 26
10–19 66
20–29 42
30–39 18
40–49 21
50–59 5
60–69 7
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 189
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| umweltbundesamt.de | 71.4 | #2,601 |
| fu-berlin.de | 71.1 | #2,764 |
| uni-muenchen.de | 68.6 | #4,314 |
| uni-tuebingen.de | 67.9 | #4,789 |
| netzpolitik.org | 66.1 | #6,384 |
| uni-bremen.de | 65.7 | #6,686 |
| hexat.com | 65.5 | #6,907 |
| vodafone.de | 64.0 | #8,778 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2014
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
agentur.vetion.dedaten.vetion.dewww.daten.vetion.demyvetlearn.vetion.devetmab.vetion.dewww.vetion.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | vetion.de | 600 | 212.87.34.52 |
| MX | vetion.de | 600 | 180 mavas2.cbxnet.de |
| MX | vetion.de | 600 | 190 mavas3.cbxnet.de |
| NS | vetion.de | 600 | ns3.cbxnet.de |
| NS | vetion.de | 600 | ns1.cbxnet.de |
| SOA | vetion.de | 600 | ns1.cbxnet.de. postmaster.cbxnet.de. 2026102404 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | vetion.de | 600 | v=spf1 ip4:212.87.33.0/24 ip4:213.191.41.0/24 ip4:212.87.34.0/24 ip4:212.87.35.0/24 ip4:212.87.49.28/32 include:_spf.smtp.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.