verna.dk
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #10,834,690
▼ 206,475
- Rank in TLD
- #69,246
▼ 2,879
- Referring Domains
- 16
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 17 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.2
- Referring Domains
- 16
- Linked Domains
- 4,406
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 8
20–29 5
30–39 1
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 16
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| fmk.dk | 44.9 | #224,816 |
| buildinggreen.eu | 43.0 | #305,148 |
| 4til1planet.dk | 30.6 | #2,020,666 |
| casinobutler.com | 29.7 | #2,318,472 |
| vahle.dk | 26.9 | #3,635,908 |
| fssp.ne | 24.6 | #5,078,969 |
| legendelivsklog.dk | 23.1 | #6,159,607 |
| hzas.dk | 20.4 | #9,130,302 |
| modo.co.nz | 19.9 | #9,978,999 |
| mainz.dk | 19.4 | #10,688,151 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .dkDenmark
- Registration date
- 7 Sept 2009
- Expires
- 30 Sept 2027 (329 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active
- Registry
- Dansk Internet Forum
- Registrar
- CURANET A/S
Subdomain
www.verna.dk
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | verna.dk | 3600 | 94.231.106.180 |
| MX | verna.dk | 3600 | 0 verna-dk.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | verna.dk | 3600 | ns1.webro.dk |
| NS | verna.dk | 3600 | ns2.webro.dk |
| SOA | verna.dk | 3600 | ns1.webro.dk. hostmaster.curanet.dk. 2026062401 14400 3600 1209600 300 |
| TXT | verna.dk | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.curanet.dk include:spf.onlinemail.io -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.