velotype.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,889,186
▲ 612,023
- Rank in TLD
- #790,459
▲ 243,184
- Referring Domains
- 19
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 23 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.1
- Referring Domains
- 19
- Linked Domains
- 26
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 5
20–29 5
30–39 3
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 19
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| clevercast.com | 50.3 | #91,885 |
| intersteno.org | 49.0 | #113,919 |
| stenoknight.com | 46.5 | #174,650 |
| omke.gr | 39.4 | #527,061 |
| loper-os.org | 35.9 | #849,240 |
| text-on-top.com | 34.5 | #1,085,283 |
| ltaproject.eu | 25.2 | #4,626,216 |
| ich-glaube-es-hackt.de | 23.6 | #5,790,203 |
| typera.net | 21.1 | #8,226,714 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 9 Jun 2003
- Last updated
- 10 May 2026
- Expires
- 9 Jun 2027 (216 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- One.com A/S
Subdomain
www.velotype.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | velotype.com | 3600 | 46.30.213.77 |
| AAAA | velotype.com | 3600 | 2a02:2350:5:10b:6b:3104:e9f1:92b5 |
| MX | velotype.com | 10800 | 10 mx1.pub.mailpod5-cph3.one.com |
| MX | velotype.com | 10800 | 10 mx2.pub.mailpod5-cph3.one.com |
| MX | velotype.com | 10800 | 10 mx3.pub.mailpod5-cph3.one.com |
| NS | velotype.com | 14400 | ns01.one.com |
| NS | velotype.com | 14400 | ns02.one.com |
| SOA | velotype.com | 14400 | ns01.one.com. hostmaster.one.com. 2026102202 14400 3600 1209600 600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.