vc.fm
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #2,912,761
▼ 32,465
- Rank in TLD
- #1,146
▼ 27
- Referring Domains
- 5
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 2 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.7
- Referring Domains
- 5
- Linked Domains
- 31
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 2
30–39 0
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 5
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| lcp.com | 48.8 | #117,819 |
| boomstartup.com | 28.8 | #2,722,267 |
| lcpireland.com | 22.7 | #6,522,377 |
| samsonrose.com | 19.6 | #10,350,955 |
| venturecapital.fm | 15.2 | #19,292,407 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .fmMicronesia
- Registration date
- 10 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 10 Oct 2027 (339 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- FSM Telecommunications Corporation
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
www.vc.fm
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | vc.fm | 300 | 141.193.213.11 |
| A | vc.fm | 300 | 141.193.213.10 |
| MX | vc.fm | 300 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | vc.fm | 300 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | vc.fm | 300 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | vc.fm | 300 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | vc.fm | 300 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | vc.fm | 86400 | george.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | vc.fm | 86400 | tricia.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | vc.fm | 1800 | george.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2417875759 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | vc.fm | 300 | google-site-verification=Lffc0z5zLDHp_NSlRwN-TgQTxmEOUoWcddN6JPV7guI |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.