vasab.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #431,664
▲ 38,729
- Rank in TLD
- #49,173
▲ 3,562
- Referring Domains
- 110
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 19 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.0
- Referring Domains
- 110
- Linked Domains
- 95
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 10
20–29 24
30–39 22
40–49 21
50–59 19
60–69 5
70–79 2
80–89 3
90–100 2
Total 110
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| umweltbundesamt.de | 71.4 | #2,601 |
| aau.dk | 70.0 | #3,393 |
| www.gov.scot | 69.8 | #3,517 |
| copernicus.org | 69.4 | #3,798 |
| ki.se | 65.0 | #7,466 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 22 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 22 Dec 2027 (412 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Key-Systems GmbH
Subdomain
www.vasab.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | vasab.org | 3600 | 91.203.68.194 |
| MX | vasab.org | 3600 | 0 vasab-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | vasab.org | 86400 | ns2.serveris.lv |
| NS | vasab.org | 86400 | ns3.serveris.lv |
| NS | vasab.org | 86400 | ns1.serveris.lv |
| SOA | vasab.org | 3600 | ns1.serveris.lv. info.serveris.lv. 2026022602 3600 600 86400 3600 |
| TXT | vasab.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net ip4:195.244.153.240 ip4:195.244.156.114 -all |
| TXT | vasab.org | 3600 | MS=ms68513145 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.