ujfp.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #666,075
▲ 4,474
- Rank in TLD
- #73,621
▲ 159
- Referring Domains
- 583
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 23 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.4
- Referring Domains
- 583
- Linked Domains
- 1,755
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 40
10–19 158
20–29 173
30–39 110
40–49 57
50–59 28
60–69 9
70–79 4
80–89 3
90–100 1
Total 583
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| constantcontact.com | 80.6 | #429 |
| uol.com.br | 77.2 | #817 |
| hrw.org | 73.4 | #1,789 |
| over-blog.com | 72.3 | #2,199 |
| timesofisrael.com | 70.8 | #2,900 |
| taz.de | 69.1 | #3,993 |
| canalblog.com | 67.4 | #5,232 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 15 May 2003
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2025
- Expires
- 15 May 2027 (191 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
ant.ujfp.orgujfp.ujfp.orgwww.ujfp.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ujfp.org | 3600 | 46.105.204.6 |
| AAAA | ujfp.org | 3600 | 2001:41d0:1:1b00:213:186:33:17 |
| MX | ujfp.org | 3600 | 1 mx0.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | ujfp.org | 3600 | 10 mx1.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | ujfp.org | 3600 | 20 mx2.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | ujfp.org | 3600 | 30 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | ujfp.org | 3600 | 40 mx4.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | ujfp.org | 1012 | ns20.ovh.net |
| NS | ujfp.org | 1012 | dns20.ovh.net |
| SOA | ujfp.org | 3600 | dns20.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2092385712 86400 3600 3600000 86400 |
| TXT | ujfp.org | 1012 | v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com -all |
| TXT | ujfp.org | 1012 | google-site-verification=gl4ybVSjaxUs3WiKGtyVKeg4bcoXAN8FOQ29Z-GXk2U |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.