turfnet.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,213,448
▲ 38,169
- Rank in TLD
- #501,707
▲ 17,632
- Referring Domains
- 110
▲ 5
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 30 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.9
- Referring Domains
- 110
- Linked Domains
- 822
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 31
20–29 20
30–39 18
40–49 6
50–59 5
60–69 5
70–79 10
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 110
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| cornell.edu | 80.6 | #424 |
| psu.edu | 77.8 | #723 |
| umn.edu | 76.7 | #913 |
| rutgers.edu | 75.3 | #1,212 |
| purdue.edu | 74.9 | #1,313 |
| ufl.edu | 74.1 | #1,532 |
| ncsu.edu | 73.7 | #1,666 |
| transistor.fm | 73.6 | #1,708 |
| umass.edu | 72.8 | #1,991 |
| unl.edu | 71.1 | #2,757 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Apr 1996
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 9 Apr 2028 (521 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
www.turfnet.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | turfnet.com | 300 | 69.164.214.179 |
| MX | turfnet.com | 300 | 0 turfnet-com.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | turfnet.com | 172800 | ns-1346.awsdns-40.org |
| NS | turfnet.com | 172800 | ns-1550.awsdns-01.co.uk |
| NS | turfnet.com | 172800 | ns-183.awsdns-22.com |
| NS | turfnet.com | 172800 | ns-910.awsdns-49.net |
| SOA | turfnet.com | 900 | ns-183.awsdns-22.com. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | turfnet.com | 300 | MS=ms78595851 |
| TXT | turfnet.com | 300 | v=spf1 +ip4:138.128.188.2 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.