ttf.sg
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #21,635,120
▼ 924,575
- Rank in TLD
- #19,879
▼ 656
- Referring Domains
- 5
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 12 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 8.7
- Referring Domains
- 5
- Linked Domains
- 46
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 0
20–29 1
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 5
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| lepetitjournal.com | 59.4 | #19,555 |
| themadscene.com | 23.4 | #5,940,354 |
| tte-sg.com | 8.7 | #48,669,338 |
| brisbanefrenchtheatre.org | 6.6 | #65,859,770 |
| singapourlemag.com | 0.5 | #135,141,218 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .sgSingapore
- Registration date
- 22 May 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2025
- Expires
- 22 May 2027 (198 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientUpdateProhibited
- Registrar
- Web Commerce Communications (S) Pte Ltd
Subdomain
www.ttf.sg
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ttf.sg | 3600 | 185.230.63.186 |
| A | ttf.sg | 3600 | 185.230.63.171 |
| A | ttf.sg | 3600 | 185.230.63.107 |
| MX | ttf.sg | 3600 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | ttf.sg | 3600 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | ttf.sg | 3600 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | ttf.sg | 3600 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | ttf.sg | 86400 | ns11.wixdns.net |
| NS | ttf.sg | 86400 | ns10.wixdns.net |
| SOA | ttf.sg | 3600 | ns10.wixdns.net. support.wix.com. 2020082807 10800 3600 1209600 3600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.