Skip to content

traillink.com

  • Domain Power global ranking: #24,261

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
58.2
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#24,261

▲ 561

Rank in TLD
#11,262

▲ 134

Referring Domains
5,213

▲ 111

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
24.1
Subdomains
2
Domain age
26 yr 7 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
wikipedia.org91.8#34
squarespace.com90.3#46
weebly.com87.4#85
outlook.com86.2#119
substack.com84.4#173
cdc.gov84.4#172
secureserver.net84.0#189
ca.gov83.6#211
stanford.edu83.3#237

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
3 Apr 2000
Last updated
2 Feb 2025
Expires
3 Apr 2030 (1,245 days remaining)
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC

Subdomain

cloudfront.traillink.comwww.traillink.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Atraillink.com18003.213.72.81
Atraillink.com1800184.192.115.50
MXtraillink.com36000 traillink-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
NStraillink.com86400ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com
NStraillink.com86400ns0.dnsmadeeasy.com
NStraillink.com86400ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com
NStraillink.com86400ns4.dnsmadeeasy.com
NStraillink.com86400ns3.dnsmadeeasy.com
SOAtraillink.com86400ns10.digicertdns.com. dns.digicertdns.com. 2009010215 43200 3600 1209600 180
TXTtraillink.com1800google-site-verification=s_9s1e45B6385iHaRl0t2iaFkyF5MazPGbHBgfKwfAE
TXTtraillink.com1800stripe-verification=679503b986742f33cbed7a9cda1443205b1bd1966c4599dff97df521afafce23
TXTtraillink.com1800v=spf1 +include:amazonses.com +include:spf.mandrillapp.com +include:spf.protection.outlook.com +include:_spfprod.ngpvan.com -all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.