thomaswebberknows.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #10,845,363
▲ 95,455
- Rank in TLD
- #4,665,781
▲ 16,464
- Referring Domains
- 3
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 50.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 5 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 50.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 71.4
- Referring Domains
- 3
- Linked Domains
- 20
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 3
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| statefarm.com | 73.6 | #1,687 |
| runsignup.com | 71.4 | #2,624 |
| thomaswebber.net | 6.9 | #63,312,830 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 5 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 5 Oct 2027 (334 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Register.com - Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
www.thomaswebberknows.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | thomaswebberknows.com | 300 | 34.69.219.172 |
| MX | thomaswebberknows.com | 300 | 2 newman-dfw-lin.mirus.io |
| MX | thomaswebberknows.com | 300 | 1 newman-nyc-do.mirus.io |
| NS | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com |
| NS | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com |
| NS | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns2.mir.us |
| NS | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com |
| NS | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com |
| NS | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns1.mirusresearch.com |
| SOA | thomaswebberknows.com | 3600 | ns1.mirusresearch.com. hostmaster.mirusresearch.com. 2026102001 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | thomaswebberknows.com | 300 | google-site-verification=_P_yodbUC3PiYQgJK9X9F9n8Q_VoLTbPfMkujzObTBM |
| TXT | thomaswebberknows.com | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx +include:spf.mtasv.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.