thinkcmf.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #437,152
▲ 9,678
- Rank in TLD
- #180,640
▲ 2,020
- Referring Domains
- 94
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.6
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 12 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 13.8
- Referring Domains
- 94
- Linked Domains
- 92
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 30
10–19 35
20–29 13
30–39 9
40–49 3
50–59 2
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 94
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| chinaz.com | 68.0 | #4,722 |
| wikidot.com | 67.7 | #4,943 |
| kancloud.cn | 54.6 | #44,469 |
| easemob.com | 52.0 | #68,757 |
| papaly.com | 46.0 | #188,527 |
| xunhupay.com | 43.7 | #273,871 |
| swoole.com | 43.5 | #281,312 |
| zhuoqun.xyz | 36.7 | #752,830 |
| wzcoder.com | 35.7 | #884,693 |
| zlfc.mobi | 35.4 | #931,654 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 6 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2024
- Expires
- 6 Dec 2026 (31 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Subdomain
demo.thinkcmf.comdemo5.thinkcmf.comwww.thinkcmf.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | thinkcmf.com | 600 | 203.107.45.167 |
| MX | thinkcmf.com | 600 | 10 mxbiz2.qq.com |
| MX | thinkcmf.com | 600 | 5 mxbiz1.qq.com |
| NS | thinkcmf.com | 86400 | dns4.hichina.com |
| NS | thinkcmf.com | 86400 | dns3.hichina.com |
| SOA | thinkcmf.com | 600 | dns3.hichina.com. hostmaster.hichina.com. 2026082509 3600 1200 86400 600 |
| TXT | thinkcmf.com | 600 | 201708280000005mb39574vr4hkcayjn7hufy6yyz96hrcnyoa1ef7cxewese28s |
| TXT | thinkcmf.com | 600 | v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.