termita.pt
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #7,391,377
▲ 206,231
- Rank in TLD
- #12,599
▲ 530
- Referring Domains
- 20
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.0
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.6
- Referring Domains
- 20
- Linked Domains
- 31
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 5
20–29 5
30–39 3
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 20
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| koozarch.com | 44.0 | #261,787 |
| gnomicbook.com | 41.6 | #380,099 |
| deadbeatclubpress.com | 38.3 | #611,086 |
| glogauair.net | 35.7 | #880,434 |
| artbooks.xyz | 35.4 | #923,666 |
| virose.pt | 29.9 | #2,255,882 |
| bienalfotografiaporto.pt | 28.6 | #2,775,965 |
| circularfestival.com | 25.8 | #4,217,006 |
| ghost.pt | 25.1 | #4,699,645 |
| lehmanncontemporary.com | 22.5 | #6,725,052 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | termita.pt | 14400 | 185.12.116.205 |
| MX | termita.pt | 14400 | 10 mail.termita.pt |
| NS | termita.pt | 86400 | ns1.dnscpanel.com |
| NS | termita.pt | 86400 | ns2.dnscpanel.com |
| NS | termita.pt | 86400 | ns3.dnscpanel.com |
| SOA | termita.pt | 86400 | ns1.dnscpanel.com. tech.flesk.com. 2026102601 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | termita.pt | 14400 | v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com +a +mx +a:wp01.host-services.com include:spf.mailbox.pt -allmailerlite-domain-verification=f4f99603a0b0a7d5237251fa894925e985d3f6b5 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
The SPF record contains invalid syntax.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.