techlawjournal.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #143,057
▼ 27,588
- Rank in TLD
- #61,456
▼ 12,174
- Referring Domains
- 322
▲ 18
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.2
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 28 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 38.5
- Referring Domains
- 322
- Linked Domains
- 4,599
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 13
10–19 47
20–29 56
30–39 56
40–49 54
50–59 46
60–69 29
70–79 13
80–89 7
90–100 1
Total 322
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| dropbox.com | 87.6 | #82 |
| columbia.edu | 85.2 | #151 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| harvard.edu | 83.6 | #218 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
| cornell.edu | 80.6 | #424 |
| latimes.com | 79.8 | #511 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 11 Feb 1998
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2025
- Expires
- 10 Feb 2028 (462 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
www.techlawjournal.comwwww.techlawjournal.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | techlawjournal.com | 300 | 64.29.145.9 |
| MX | techlawjournal.com | 300 | 120 mx4c25.carrierzone.com |
| MX | techlawjournal.com | 300 | 10 mx1c25.carrierzone.com |
| MX | techlawjournal.com | 300 | 100 mx2c25.carrierzone.com |
| MX | techlawjournal.com | 300 | 110 mx3c25.carrierzone.com |
| NS | techlawjournal.com | 300 | ns.comcity.com |
| NS | techlawjournal.com | 300 | ns2.comcity.com |
| SOA | techlawjournal.com | 300 | ns.comcity.com. hostmaster.comcity.com. 2026071901 3600 900 604800 3600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.