techdailytimes.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #2,569,498
▲ 151,269
- Rank in TLD
- #1,084,652
▲ 41,656
- Referring Domains
- 120
▼ 14
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 6 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.8
- Referring Domains
- 120
- Linked Domains
- 4,316
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 27
10–19 35
20–29 22
30–39 12
40–49 8
50–59 8
60–69 5
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 120
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.fr | 80.4 | #457 |
| google.se | 72.5 | #2,133 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| wasabisys.com | 66.0 | #6,466 |
| google.cl | 63.8 | #9,064 |
| google.lk | 62.9 | #10,479 |
| google.lt | 62.9 | #10,467 |
| google.com.co | 61.8 | #12,680 |
| google.com.jm | 58.5 | #23,198 |
| google.sc | 58.2 | #24,367 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 10 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 10 Feb 2027 (97 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NameCheap, Inc.
Subdomain
www.techdailytimes.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | techdailytimes.com | 1800 | 82.29.80.255 |
| AAAA | techdailytimes.com | 1800 | 2a02:4780:b:664:0:295d:62ae:7 |
| MX | techdailytimes.com | 14400 | 5 mx1.hostinger.pk |
| MX | techdailytimes.com | 14400 | 10 mx2.hostinger.pk |
| NS | techdailytimes.com | 86400 | ns2.dns-parking.com |
| NS | techdailytimes.com | 86400 | ns1.dns-parking.com |
| SOA | techdailytimes.com | 3600 | ns1.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026110501 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| TXT | techdailytimes.com | 14400 | v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.