tec-bite.ch
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least three years ago. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #1,212,255
▲ 1,030,573
- Rank in TLD
- #8,368
▲ 7,935
- Referring Domains
- 16
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 7 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 33.7
- Referring Domains
- 16
- Linked Domains
- 261
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 1
20–29 4
30–39 5
40–49 3
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 16
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| cyberus-technology.de | 60.1 | #17,037 |
| datenschutzpartner.ch | 56.4 | #33,339 |
| capx.co | 49.9 | #97,633 |
| msxfaq.de | 44.3 | #249,300 |
| it-service.network | 43.6 | #277,697 |
| abat.de | 39.8 | #493,741 |
| avantec.ch | 36.6 | #764,956 |
| xorlab.com | 35.8 | #862,130 |
| infosec.ch | 31.6 | #1,731,471 |
| keyhunters.ru | 30.5 | #2,028,238 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .chSwitzerland
- Registration date
- 18 Dec 2018
- Domain statuses
- active
Subdomain
www.tec-bite.ch
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | tec-bite.ch | 1800 | 149.126.6.73 |
| MX | tec-bite.ch | 1800 | 10 mail.avantec.ch |
| MX | tec-bite.ch | 1800 | 20 mail2.avantec.ch |
| NS | tec-bite.ch | 3600 | ns11.infomaniak.ch |
| NS | tec-bite.ch | 3600 | ns12.infomaniak.ch |
| SOA | tec-bite.ch | 3600 | ns11.infomaniak.ch. hostmaster.infomaniak.ch. 2026092245 10800 3600 605800 3600 |
| TXT | tec-bite.ch | 10800 | MS=ms11090538 |
| TXT | tec-bite.ch | 10800 | mx-4bfc712747f7efd7 |
| TXT | tec-bite.ch | 10800 | v=spf1 MX a:www.tec-bite.ch a:mail-gateway-agency02.cyon.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.