teamlyzer.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #548,960
▲ 138,920
- Rank in TLD
- #225,353
▲ 54,467
- Referring Domains
- 42
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.3
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 9 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 34.3
- Referring Domains
- 42
- Linked Domains
- 2,433
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 5
20–29 9
30–39 9
40–49 4
50–59 6
60–69 2
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 42
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| linktr.ee | 84.7 | #161 |
| dev.to | 77.3 | #807 |
| greenhouse.io | 76.4 | #966 |
| habr.com | 70.0 | #3,363 |
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
| iol.pt | 62.7 | #10,844 |
| accio.com | 58.3 | #23,900 |
| wellhub.com | 56.4 | #33,378 |
| jornaldenegocios.pt | 55.9 | #35,854 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 25 Nov 2028 (752 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
blog.teamlyzer.compt.teamlyzer.comwww.teamlyzer.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | teamlyzer.com | 300 | 205.147.200.141 |
| MX | teamlyzer.com | 3600 | 1 smtp.google.com |
| NS | teamlyzer.com | 3600 | ns20.ovh.net |
| NS | teamlyzer.com | 3600 | dns20.ovh.net |
| SOA | teamlyzer.com | 3600 | dns20.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2091928994 86400 3600 3600000 300 |
| TXT | teamlyzer.com | 600 | 4|https://pt.teamlyzer.com |
| TXT | teamlyzer.com | 600 | GOOGLE-SITE-VERIFICATION=GH70I4FHPHZHVT5VQWLQ5VGUIQUKSRYBLGI_JUGCWQI |
| TXT | teamlyzer.com | 600 | google-site-verification=8Lhl-FW_FhvpzAe4lPZKL183d7PPAEfFfeJkwcTJ6bk |
| TXT | teamlyzer.com | 600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sparkpostmail.com include:_spf.kmitd.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.