Skip to content

tato.net

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
37.4
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#686,048

▼ 67,301

Rank in TLD
#23,024

▼ 2,219

Referring Domains
252

▼ 5

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
21.4
Subdomains
10
Domain age
26 yr 9 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
nazwa.pl71.9#2,373
pl.tl66.1#6,379
uw.edu.pl63.7#9,186
aleteia.org61.5#13,325
at.ua60.9#14,753
orange.pl59.3#19,937
uni.lodz.pl58.0#25,179
ur.edu.pl57.7#26,344
niedziela.pl54.8#43,600

Basic Information

TLD
.net
Registration date
6 Jan 2000
Last updated
6 Jan 2026
Expires
6 Jan 2027 (62 days remaining)
Registrar
Key-Systems GmbH

Subdomain

forum.tato.netwww.forum.tato.netgrupowe-plz.tato.neto.k.tato.netlepszy.tato.netold.tato.netpodcasty.tato.netsklep.tato.netwww.sklep.tato.netwww.tato.net

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Atato.net300178.216.202.104
Atato.net300178.216.201.250
MXtato.net3000 tato-net.mail.protection.outlook.com
NStato.net86400dns2.smarthost.pl
NStato.net86400dns3.smarthost.pl
NStato.net86400dns.smarthost.pl
SOAtato.net86400dns.smarthost.pl. sysadmin.smarthost.pl. 2026110501 3600 1800 1209600 86400
TXTtato.net300v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.211.220.48 +ip4:91.211.222.215 +ip4:91.211.220.45 +ip4:91.211.222.228 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com +include:_spf.freshmail.pl +include:_spf.emaillabs.net.pl +include:_spf.mlsend.com +include:spf-eu.emailsignatures365.com -all
TXTtato.net300mailerlite-domain-verification=24b8d4cf5e1106811a130cf4f38fc25204e74861
TXTtato.net300stripe-verification=b81c1216092b1a8237591fa9feec177e44578311ac98678c1873f4b0cea85abe
TXTtato.net300asv=d162c395d8eff4aa05026c4b126e319d

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.