tama.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #183,531
▼ 16,959
- Rank in TLD
- #77,966
▼ 7,558
- Referring Domains
- 641
▼ 16
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.1
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 31 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 17.0
- Referring Domains
- 641
- Linked Domains
- 86
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 141
10–19 243
20–29 152
30–39 67
40–49 24
50–59 10
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 641
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| unt.edu | 66.6 | #5,840 |
| musicradar.com | 60.2 | #16,806 |
| accio.com | 58.3 | #23,900 |
| my-best.com | 57.6 | #26,891 |
| blabbermouth.net | 53.9 | #50,575 |
| shimamura.co.jp | 52.5 | #63,417 |
| wacken.com | 52.1 | #67,363 |
| bonedo.de | 52.0 | #68,737 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 21 Mar 1995
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 22 Mar 2027 (137 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
forum.tama.comwww.tama.comwww.www.tama.comwww2.tama.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | tama.com | 360 | 52.192.175.162 |
| NS | tama.com | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp |
| NS | tama.com | 86400 | 02.dnsv.jp |
| NS | tama.com | 86400 | 03.dnsv.jp |
| NS | tama.com | 86400 | 04.dnsv.jp |
| SOA | tama.com | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp. hostmaster.dnsv.jp. 1675987960 3600 900 604800 300 |
| TXT | tama.com | 3600 | v=spf1 +ip4:52.192.175.162 include:spf.haihaimail.jp -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.