talkgeo.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #636,413
▼ 220,150
- Rank in TLD
- #260,926
▼ 90,521
- Referring Domains
- 42
▲ 6
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.5
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 12 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.3
- Referring Domains
- 42
- Linked Domains
- 224
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 12
10–19 15
20–29 8
30–39 1
40–49 2
50–59 2
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 42
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| rakuten.co.jp | 80.6 | #427 |
| easy.co | 55.8 | #36,429 |
| viesearch.com | 50.1 | #94,439 |
| architectureartdesigns.com | 48.5 | #124,065 |
| stockagile.com | 41.6 | #381,501 |
| talkingcity.org | 34.9 | #1,016,205 |
| cadranpolitic.ro | 28.2 | #2,989,786 |
| chrisfenwick.com | 26.7 | #3,711,222 |
| cluboo.com | 26.5 | #3,810,754 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 7 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 4 Jul 2026
- Expires
- 7 Jul 2027 (244 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Subdomain
www.talkgeo.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | talkgeo.com | 43200 | 67.225.138.29 |
| MX | talkgeo.com | 43200 | 10 mail.talkgeo.com |
| NS | talkgeo.com | 43200 | ns1.megriwebhosting.com |
| NS | talkgeo.com | 43200 | ns2.megriwebhosting.com |
| SOA | talkgeo.com | 2560 | ns1.megriwebhosting.com. hostmaster.talkgeo.com. 1711386774 7200 300 1209600 10800 |
| TXT | talkgeo.com | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx a:host.megriwebhosting.com ip4:67.225.138.29 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.