Skip to content

support.bible

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
32.0
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#1,635,413

▼ 636,028

Rank in TLD
#35

▼ 12

Referring Domains
4

▲ 1

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
40.7
Subdomains
0
Domain age
4 yr 1 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
sil.org72.3#2,196
paratext.org41.9#363,606
forallthings.bible26.5#3,832,874
emdc.blog22.0#7,160,341

Basic Information

TLD
.bible
Registration date
8 Sept 2022
Last updated
21 Oct 2026
Expires
8 Sept 2027 (307 days remaining)
Registrar
Porkbun

Subdomain

No data

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Asupport.bible300172.67.148.190
Asupport.bible300104.21.29.99
AAAAsupport.bible3002606:4700:3030::ac43:94be
AAAAsupport.bible3002606:4700:3033::6815:1d63
MXsupport.bible60010 mx.zoho.com
MXsupport.bible60020 mx2.zoho.com
MXsupport.bible60050 mx3.zoho.com
NSsupport.bible86400jerry.ns.cloudflare.com
NSsupport.bible86400rosa.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAsupport.bible1800jerry.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2415683665 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTsupport.bible3600v=spf1 +ip4:159.112.216.4 include:zohomail.com -all
CAAsupport.bible3000 issue "comodoca.com"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issue "digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issue "letsencrypt.org"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issue "pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issue "ssl.com"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issue "trust-provider.com"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issuewild "comodoca.com"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issuewild "digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issuewild "letsencrypt.org"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issuewild "pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"
CAAsupport.bible3000 issuewild "ssl.com"

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.