superic.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #3,313,326
▼ 844,854
- Rank in TLD
- #1,393,149
▼ 373,583
- Referring Domains
- 285
▲ 19
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.9
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 23 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.3
- Referring Domains
- 285
- Linked Domains
- 812
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 55
10–19 149
20–29 56
30–39 9
40–49 6
50–59 5
60–69 2
70–79 3
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 285
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| xsrv.jp | 71.0 | #2,829 |
| uqam.ca | 66.1 | #6,326 |
| themehorse.com | 64.7 | #7,834 |
| accio.com | 58.3 | #23,900 |
| opovo.com.br | 56.0 | #35,652 |
| tru.ca | 54.6 | #44,472 |
| legra.ph | 54.6 | #44,392 |
| cnx-software.com | 53.1 | #57,371 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 22 Jun 2003
- Last updated
- 12 May 2023
- Expires
- 22 Jun 2028 (595 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Subdomain
bbs.superic.comdo.superic.comhao.superic.comwww.superic.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | superic.com | 600 | 106.12.52.101 |
| MX | superic.com | 3600 | 10 mxw.mxhichina.com |
| MX | superic.com | 3600 | 5 mxn.mxhichina.com |
| NS | superic.com | 86400 | dns29.hichina.com |
| NS | superic.com | 86400 | dns30.hichina.com |
| SOA | superic.com | 600 | dns29.hichina.com. hostmaster.hichina.com. 2026082509 3600 1200 86400 600 |
| TXT | superic.com | 600 | v=spf1 include:spf.mxhichina.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.