summerjam.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #181,470
▼ 14,396
- Rank in TLD
- #7,648
▼ 305
- Referring Domains
- 229
▼ 18
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Referring Domains
- 229
- Linked Domains
- 47
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 24
10–19 62
20–29 70
30–39 40
40–49 18
50–59 10
60–69 4
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 229
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| e-recht24.de | 84.1 | #185 |
| goethe.de | 68.2 | #4,617 |
| germany.travel | 65.2 | #7,270 |
| ksta.de | 63.1 | #10,063 |
| freenet.de | 61.4 | #13,480 |
| mitvergnuegen.com | 57.7 | #26,332 |
| remitly.com | 57.6 | #26,991 |
| rundschau-online.de | 57.6 | #27,192 |
| flypgs.com | 55.7 | #37,527 |
| activeboard.com | 55.0 | #42,008 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2021
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
en.summerjam.dewww.en.summerjam.deoffice.summerjam.dewww.shop.summerjam.dewww.summerjam.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | summerjam.de | 86400 | 5.75.209.56 |
| MX | summerjam.de | 86400 | 10 mail.clouso-server.de |
| NS | summerjam.de | 86400 | ns1.first-ns.de |
| NS | summerjam.de | 86400 | robotns2.second-ns.de |
| NS | summerjam.de | 86400 | robotns3.second-ns.com |
| SOA | summerjam.de | 86400 | ns1.first-ns.de. dns.hetzner.com. 2026042900 14400 1800 604800 86400 |
| TXT | summerjam.de | 86400 | v=spf1 mx ptr include:spf.mailjet.com ~all |
| TXT | summerjam.de | 86400 | google-site-verification=dz3vFZATZJRmCoErOsJFWOFV-8gBXz6yHzfDUPl6eHU |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=reject, but the policy applies to only 5% of messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.