submeet.vet
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,917,905
▼ 458,350
- Rank in TLD
- #57
▼ 7
- Referring Domains
- 227
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.0
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.3
- Referring Domains
- 227
- Linked Domains
- 0
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 12
10–19 109
20–29 57
30–39 17
40–49 17
50–59 12
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 227
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ning.com | 72.1 | #2,291 |
| liu.se | 69.8 | #3,522 |
| rentry.co | 61.6 | #13,095 |
| fogbugz.com | 58.6 | #22,509 |
| phacility.com | 57.5 | #27,601 |
| 1gb.ru | 57.5 | #27,296 |
| dinstudio.se | 56.7 | #31,609 |
| activeboard.com | 55.0 | #42,008 |
| snippet.host | 54.5 | #45,781 |
| grepmed.com | 53.0 | #58,189 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .vet
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | submeet.vet | 300 | 199.192.19.39 |
| MX | submeet.vet | 300 | 10 submeet.vet |
| NS | submeet.vet | 1800 | pdns1.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | submeet.vet | 1800 | pdns2.registrar-servers.com |
| SOA | submeet.vet | 3601 | pdns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1793728930 43200 3600 604800 3601 |
| TXT | submeet.vet | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:199.192.19.39 -all |
| TXT | submeet.vet | 300 | google-site-verification=anO4eHDv1i2iMxooNOwHqWO1eLBdGB53ML4A1xX_zOQ |
| TXT | submeet.vet | 300 | google-site-verification=kx3bVLrL_2by2-Xa9z26r6T2K_eP9iignWsMqAu3FUw |
| TXT | submeet.vet | 300 | google-site-verification=l1XczGEaSixw-Bo-JqwTq_-d_aYu7cvOWJ_0clX1-oA |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.