student.no
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #714,066
▼ 7,904
- Rank in TLD
- #2,475
▼ 62
- Referring Domains
- 103
▲ 7
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.5
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- 26 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.6
- Referring Domains
- 103
- Linked Domains
- 102
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 19
20–29 22
30–39 14
40–49 23
50–59 15
60–69 6
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 103
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| canalblog.com | 67.4 | #5,232 |
| uib.no | 66.2 | #6,228 |
| ntnu.no | 63.9 | #8,951 |
| ovgu.de | 61.9 | #12,375 |
| ntnu.edu | 61.9 | #12,572 |
| uit.no | 61.8 | #12,595 |
| hkdir.no | 59.2 | #20,184 |
| oslomet.no | 58.7 | #22,275 |
| bdsmovement.net | 58.7 | #22,382 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
mail.student.nonestleder.student.nonyhetsbrev.student.notuva.student.nowww.student.no
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | student.no | 1152 | 193.107.30.178 |
| MX | student.no | 900 | 0 student-no.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | student.no | 3600 | ns.datacenter.no |
| NS | student.no | 3600 | ns2.datacenter.no |
| SOA | student.no | 7200 | ns.datacenter.no. hostmaster.student.no. 2026090202 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | student.no | 900 | MS=ms36765974 |
| TXT | student.no | 900 | v7khdu3o4onsvklnvtjt63iv4o |
| TXT | student.no | 900 | MS=E8FB7F89331C9A007F6493115A0397F86071107A |
| TXT | student.no | 900 | v=spf1 a mx include:spf.mailanyone.net include:sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.intility.no include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.sndr.no -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.