structuralfunds.org.cy
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #445,599
▲ 103,561
- Rank in TLD
- #77
▲ 14
- Referring Domains
- 29
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.4
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.8
- Referring Domains
- 29
- Linked Domains
- 79
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 5
20–29 4
30–39 6
40–49 8
50–59 3
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 29
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| ucy.ac.cy | 58.3 | #23,691 |
| cut.ac.cy | 52.8 | #59,898 |
| moi.gov.cy | 51.9 | #69,559 |
| interreg-med.eu | 49.0 | #115,126 |
| cyi.ac.cy | 48.6 | #122,143 |
| mcit.gov.cy | 48.2 | #131,823 |
| moec.gov.cy | 47.5 | #147,921 |
| nicosia.org.cy | 45.4 | #209,855 |
| cyens.org.cy | 43.9 | #263,668 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .cyCyprus
No data
Subdomain
edafiki.structuralfunds.org.cyedafikis2007.structuralfunds.org.cystructuralfunds2007-2013.structuralfunds.org.cywww.structuralfunds.org.cy
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | 35.214.170.248 |
| MX | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | 10 mail2.ebos.com.cy |
| MX | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | 0 mail.ebos.com.cy |
| NS | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | pdns13.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | pdns14.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | pdns01.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | structuralfunds.org.cy | 3600 | pdns02.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | structuralfunds.org.cy | 600 | pdns13.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026012801 28800 7200 604800 600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
A mail server hostname could not be resolved to an IP address.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.