ssmatkd.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. This domain was registered at least three years ago.
- Global Rank
- #5,189,617
▼ 234,015
- Rank in TLD
- #2,172,572
▼ 93,420
- Referring Domains
- 74
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 3 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.7
- Referring Domains
- 74
- Linked Domains
- 151
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 18
20–29 56
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 74
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| eshihuo.com | 24.8 | #4,915,230 |
| boayuan.com | 24.8 | #4,874,586 |
| tianjinlingfu.com | 24.0 | #5,516,884 |
| tcpips.com | 23.8 | #5,597,462 |
| szlhty.com | 23.8 | #5,627,987 |
| emiaow998.com | 23.8 | #5,600,765 |
| ispa-online.com | 23.8 | #5,605,585 |
| lianchengzl.com | 23.6 | #5,771,677 |
| sanjiangweb.com | 23.6 | #5,781,950 |
| registerpol.com | 23.6 | #5,761,294 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 11 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 11 Jan 2027 (67 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Subdomain
www.ssmatkd.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ssmatkd.com | 600 | 156.225.140.3 |
| NS | ssmatkd.com | 86400 | ns1.dns.com |
| NS | ssmatkd.com | 86400 | ns2.dns.com |
| SOA | ssmatkd.com | 600 | ns1.dns.com. admin.dns.com. 1791046774 3600 300 1209600 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.