spoon.guru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #443,368
▲ 8,625
- Rank in TLD
- #60
▲ 3
- Referring Domains
- 69
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 35.1
- Referring Domains
- 69
- Linked Domains
- 32
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 9
20–29 11
30–39 13
40–49 15
50–59 9
60–69 3
70–79 1
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 69
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| uga.edu | 71.6 | #2,534 |
| flywheelsites.com | 66.9 | #5,641 |
| effectivealtruism.org | 63.2 | #9,959 |
| valtech.com | 60.3 | #16,540 |
| averydennison.com | 59.9 | #17,785 |
| verdict.co.uk | 58.1 | #24,487 |
| startups.co.uk | 57.8 | #25,960 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .guru
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
www.spoon.guru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | spoon.guru | 8600 | 146.148.23.211 |
| MX | spoon.guru | 8600 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | spoon.guru | 8600 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | spoon.guru | 8600 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | spoon.guru | 8600 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | spoon.guru | 8600 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | spoon.guru | 3600 | ns65.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | spoon.guru | 3600 | ns66.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | spoon.guru | 3600 | ns65.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026110201 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | spoon.guru | 8600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:20106164.spf07.hubspotemail.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.kanbanize.com ~all |
| TXT | spoon.guru | 8600 | spoon.guru. |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.