spaness.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #1,684,702
▼ 147,670
- Rank in TLD
- #78,140
▼ 8,489
- Referring Domains
- 253
▼ 8
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.3
- Referring Domains
- 253
- Linked Domains
- 1,036
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 45
20–29 129
30–39 45
40–49 14
50–59 4
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 253
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| rtl.de | 68.9 | #4,143 |
| jugendherberge.de | 61.8 | #12,669 |
| detektor.fm | 55.2 | #40,758 |
| hamm.de | 52.9 | #59,072 |
| connektar.de | 50.8 | #84,809 |
| shecancode.io | 50.4 | #89,551 |
| atlantic-hotels.de | 48.9 | #116,639 |
| trusted-blogs.com | 48.1 | #133,747 |
| ist-hochschule.de | 47.8 | #140,204 |
| ostbayern-tourismus.de | 47.1 | #159,148 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2021
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.spaness.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | spaness.de | 400 | 91.230.22.162 |
| AAAA | spaness.de | 400 | 2a0b:fb00:9:0:1:230:22:162 |
| MX | spaness.de | 400 | 30 mx3.webhoster.org |
| MX | spaness.de | 400 | 20 mx2.webhoster.net |
| MX | spaness.de | 400 | 10 spamschutz.webhoster.de |
| MX | spaness.de | 400 | 40 mx4.webhoster.at |
| NS | spaness.de | 400 | q2.dnsservice.net |
| NS | spaness.de | 400 | q1.dnsservice.net |
| SOA | spaness.de | 400 | q1.dnsservice.net. info.webhoster.de. 2021230201 10800 3600 2419200 400 |
| TXT | spaness.de | 400 | v=spf1 mx include:spf.webhoster.de ip4:185.159.120.246 ip4:91.230.22.162 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.