solutionteam.se
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. This domain was registered at least three years ago.
- Global Rank
- #3,653,437
▼ 59,558
- Rank in TLD
- #20,910
▼ 451
- Referring Domains
- 156
▼ 28
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 9 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.0
- Referring Domains
- 156
- Linked Domains
- 10,725
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 24
10–19 90
20–29 30
30–39 8
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 156
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| bc.edu | 67.7 | #4,983 |
| infopro-digital.com | 53.2 | #55,944 |
| webofthings.org | 44.7 | #232,673 |
| cekuj.net | 42.7 | #319,047 |
| nawateharutaka.com | 37.5 | #673,641 |
| ibirapuera.org | 36.6 | #769,833 |
| ofix.or.jp | 35.3 | #948,076 |
| karmickdev.com | 35.2 | #963,119 |
| lfm30.se | 35.0 | #984,431 |
| vildastamps.com | 32.0 | #1,634,066 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .seSweden
- Registration date
- 10 Apr 2017
- Expires
- 10 Apr 2027 (156 days remaining)
- Registrar
- One.com
Subdomain
www.solutionteam.se
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | solutionteam.se | 3600 | 46.30.215.65 |
| AAAA | solutionteam.se | 3600 | 2a02:2350:5:111:8:202b:5a9d:7085 |
| MX | solutionteam.se | 3600 | 0 solutionteam-se.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | solutionteam.se | 14400 | ns01.one.com |
| NS | solutionteam.se | 14400 | ns02.one.com |
| SOA | solutionteam.se | 14400 | ns01.one.com. hostmaster.one.com. 2026103102 14400 3600 1209600 600 |
| TXT | solutionteam.se | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_custspf.one.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.