softrew.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #1,500,706
▼ 149,601
- Rank in TLD
- #28,675
▼ 3,079
- Referring Domains
- 79
▲ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 15 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.1
- Referring Domains
- 79
- Linked Domains
- 690
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 10
10–19 34
20–29 20
30–39 5
40–49 4
50–59 2
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 79
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| opera.com | 86.1 | #121 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| linux.org.ru | 54.8 | #42,969 |
| prlog.ru | 51.5 | #74,308 |
| aimp.ru | 49.3 | #108,195 |
| r7-office.ru | 47.5 | #148,103 |
| outsidethebox.ms | 41.3 | #399,549 |
| wmmail.ru | 40.9 | #420,350 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 28 Feb 2011
- Expires
- 28 Feb 2027 (115 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED UNVERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- REGRU-RU
Subdomain
www.softrew.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | softrew.ru | 300 | 195.123.210.191 |
| MX | softrew.ru | 300 | 10 _dc-mx.3aee73db1e0f.softrew.ru |
| MX | softrew.ru | 300 | 20 _dc-mx.3aee73db1e0f.softrew.ru |
| NS | softrew.ru | 86400 | cloe.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | softrew.ru | 86400 | hasslo.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | softrew.ru | 1800 | cloe.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2415391034 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Configuration error
An MX record has an invalid priority or hostname.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.