smartpress.by
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #141,833
▲ 130,123
- Rank in TLD
- #85
▲ 70
- Referring Domains
- 417
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 6 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.0
- Referring Domains
- 417
- Linked Domains
- 1,759
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 46
10–19 101
20–29 111
30–39 75
40–49 54
50–59 16
60–69 8
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 417
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| yandex.ru | 90.3 | #47 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| army.mil | 73.7 | #1,652 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| rustore.ru | 72.3 | #2,208 |
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| vedomosti.ru | 67.0 | #5,513 |
| themoscowtimes.com | 66.3 | #6,151 |
| diplo.de | 65.5 | #6,963 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .byBelarus
- Registration date
- 8 Jun 2020
- Expires
- 8 Jun 2027 (215 days remaining)
- Registry
- Belarusian Cloud Technologies LLC
- Registrar
- Reliable Software, Ltd
Subdomain
afisha.smartpress.by
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | smartpress.by | 600 | 193.176.183.114 |
| MX | smartpress.by | 3600 | 10 mxs.activeby.net |
| NS | smartpress.by | 600 | u2.hoster.by |
| NS | smartpress.by | 600 | u1.hoster.by |
| SOA | smartpress.by | 600 | u1.hoster.by. support.hoster.by. 2026090303 43200 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | smartpress.by | 3600 | C1E86E3E33CE |
| TXT | smartpress.by | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx include:spfmseru.atservers.net -all |
| TXT | smartpress.by | 3600 | google-site-verification=qfDx0e_Ozg7SqoDQLu2HPm62a8l2YQvUQTQNaBdc6j8 |
| TXT | smartpress.by | 3600 | _globalsign-domain-verification=Wx1anDpxUALsdo45ZruBUkTbfytCcjxFpnoC89Pg9E |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.