sintef.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #484,583
▲ 36,515
- Rank in TLD
- #199,381
▲ 12,956
- Referring Domains
- 204
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.5
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 26 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 30.7
- Referring Domains
- 204
- Linked Domains
- 927
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 38
20–29 44
30–39 41
40–49 21
50–59 23
60–69 10
70–79 9
80–89 2
90–100 2
Total 204
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| alibaba.com | 77.4 | #783 |
| utexas.edu | 77.4 | #796 |
| acast.com | 74.7 | #1,366 |
| fraunhofer.de | 74.2 | #1,503 |
| splunk.com | 73.0 | #1,901 |
| esa.int | 72.9 | #1,950 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 11 Aug 2000
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 11 Aug 2027 (279 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Domeneshop AS dba domainnameshop.com
Subdomain
blog.sintef.comwww.sintef.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | sintef.com | 300 | 217.114.94.2 |
| MX | sintef.com | 3600 | 10 sintef.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | sintef.com | 86400 | nac.no |
| NS | sintef.com | 86400 | ns.uninett.no |
| SOA | sintef.com | 3600 | nictool.uninett.no. hostmaster.sintef.no. 2025110400 28800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | sintef.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.