singlewindow.cn
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #36,053
▲ 376
- Rank in TLD
- #509
▲ 37
- Referring Domains
- 556
▲ 26
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.9
- Subdomains
- 38
- Domain age
- 12 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.0
- Referring Domains
- 556
- Linked Domains
- 45
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 164
10–19 128
20–29 106
30–39 55
40–49 36
50–59 31
60–69 21
70–79 12
80–89 3
90–100 0
Total 556
Referring Domains
Basic Information
- TLD
- .cnChina
- Registration date
- 6 Jun 2014
- Expires
- 6 Jun 2033 (2,405 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registrar
- 阿里云计算有限公司(万网)
Subdomain
app.singlewindow.cncifer.singlewindow.cnwww.cifer.singlewindow.cnciferquery.singlewindow.cncifrt.singlewindow.cncq.singlewindow.cnen.singlewindow.cng.singlewindow.cngacc.singlewindow.cngd.singlewindow.cngz.gd.singlewindow.cnzh.gd.singlewindow.cngs.singlewindow.cngsapp.singlewindow.cngx.singlewindow.cnha.singlewindow.cnheapp.singlewindow.cnhljapp.singlewindow.cnhn.singlewindow.cnhubei.singlewindow.cn
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| NS | singlewindow.cn | 3600 | vns1.zdnscloud.biz |
| NS | singlewindow.cn | 3600 | ins1.zdnscloud.com |
| NS | singlewindow.cn | 3600 | dns1.zdnscloud.info |
| NS | singlewindow.cn | 3600 | cns1.zdnscloud.net |
| SOA | singlewindow.cn | 3600 | cns1.zdnscloud.net. mail.knet.cn. 1045 3600 3600 3600 900 |
| TXT | singlewindow.cn | 600 | globalsign-domain-verification=_GA-g2xWwxzsEP_GnjM9EPldBP0gLlMi5Q5jspyQi4 |
| TXT | singlewindow.cn | 600 | _globalsign-domain-verification=hlKqZDHjnvU8xYrPRup5-26NmIF2jACm6ksdIdeKTr |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.