singleaktiv.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #18,590,194
▼ 1,568,511
- Rank in TLD
- #1,103,773
▼ 73,381
- Referring Domains
- 29
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.6
- Subdomains
- 6
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.2
- Referring Domains
- 29
- Linked Domains
- 487
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 11
20–29 5
30–39 6
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 29
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| topblogs.de | 50.3 | #91,481 |
| tagseoblog.de | 45.3 | #212,271 |
| seo-trainee.de | 39.1 | #551,752 |
| henning-uhle.eu | 37.6 | #669,778 |
| netreview.de | 36.2 | #818,259 |
| internetblogger.de | 35.9 | #853,159 |
| blogs-optimieren.de | 35.8 | #858,853 |
| meinungs-blog.de | 31.1 | #1,858,925 |
| boschblog.de | 29.1 | #2,565,244 |
| tobiaskocht.com | 27.3 | #3,413,068 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 8 Sept 2020
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
beautylounge.singleaktiv.deblog.singleaktiv.dewww.blog.singleaktiv.deliebeskummer-hilfe.singleaktiv.detestbericht.singleaktiv.dewww.singleaktiv.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | 85.13.130.98 |
| MX | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | 10 w01a826a.kasserver.com |
| NS | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | ns6.kasserver.com |
| NS | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com |
| NS | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | ns5.name-server-kas.de |
| NS | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | ns3.ai-dns.de |
| SOA | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com. hostmaster.kasserver.com. 2610110214 28800 7200 1209600 7200 |
| TXT | singleaktiv.de | 7200 | v=spf1 a mx include:spf.kasserver.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.