Skip to content

simnet.org

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
45.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#219,041

▼ 5,798

Rank in TLD
#25,097

▼ 945

Referring Domains
367

▲ 18

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
33.2
Subdomains
19
Domain age
32 yr 6 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
iheart.com81.0#389
cisco.com80.3#461
techtarget.com79.8#518
atlassian.net79.5#543
psu.edu77.8#723
illinois.edu76.2#1,008
asu.edu74.1#1,528
wildapricot.org74.0#1,551
swoogo.com72.3#2,211
networkworld.com71.2#2,731

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
3 May 1994
Last updated
11 Aug 2026
Expires
4 May 2029 (911 days remaining)
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC

Subdomain

academic.simnet.orgapc.simnet.orgcareers.simnet.orgchapter.simnet.orgea.simnet.orgeawg.simnet.orgfoundation.simnet.orgmembers.simnet.orgmit.simnet.orgnational.simnet.orgportland.simnet.orgprocurement.simnet.orgprogram.simnet.orgrlf.simnet.orgsimwomen.simnet.orgstem.simnet.orgtechexec.simnet.orgtrends.simnet.orgwww.simnet.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Asimnet.org900192.237.140.234
MXsimnet.org720010 aspmx3.googlemail.com
MXsimnet.org72005 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXsimnet.org720010 aspmx2.googlemail.com
MXsimnet.org72005 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
MXsimnet.org72001 aspmx.l.google.com
NSsimnet.org7200ns41.worldnic.com
NSsimnet.org7200ns42.worldnic.com
TXTsimnet.org900v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com include:spf.gocadmium.com include:spf.ymem.net include:zcsend.net include:one.zoho.com ~all
TXTsimnet.org900u38g1ukfcbttbchp0rrboutmia
TXTsimnet.org3600MS=ms18754266

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.